Living Labs Archives - Systemic https://systemicproject.eu/category/ll/ Circular solutions for biowaste Sun, 21 Nov 2021 20:15:34 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 https://systemicproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/cropped-ss-32x32.png Living Labs Archives - Systemic https://systemicproject.eu/category/ll/ 32 32 Living labs meeting a Groot Zevert demo plant https://systemicproject.eu/living-labs-meeting-a-groot-zevert-demo-plant/ Fri, 22 Oct 2021 12:34:20 +0000 https://systemicproject.eu/?p=5765 The H2020 project SYSTEMIC organised a Living Lab meeting and site visits to demonstration plant Groot Zevert Vergisting (GZV, Netherlands) and Benas (Germany). Highlight of the two-day visit was the new paper moulding machine at BENAS were organic fibres from digestate are turned into cardboard products. At the first day, the group of representatives of […]

The post Living labs meeting a Groot Zevert demo plant appeared first on Systemic.

]]>

The H2020 project SYSTEMIC organised a Living Lab meeting and site visits to demonstration plant Groot Zevert Vergisting (GZV, Netherlands) and Benas (Germany). Highlight of the two-day visit was the new paper moulding machine at BENAS were organic fibres from digestate are turned into cardboard products.
At the first day, the group of representatives of 6 SYSTEMIC Outreach Locations, 3 Demo Plants and 1 Associated Plant met in Beltrum, located in an agricultural area in the eastern part of the Netherlands.

Here they were able to discuss the business cases their biogas plant, regarding digestate treatment with nutrient recovery, exchange experiences and look into possibilities for the future. Afterwards, they received a detailed presentation on Demo Plant GZV, to prepare them for their site visit that afternoon.

GZV turns pig slurry and residues from agro-industry into 9.7 million m3 of biogas, organic- and mineral fertilising products and clean water. The solid fraction of digestate is exported to Germany whereas the liquid fraction is further processed into an RO concentrate with 7.6 g N/kg in mineral form. This fertiliser complies with criteria for RENURE products and GZV has a temporary exemption to use RO concentrate on top of the limit of 170 kg N/ha thereby replacing synthetic nitrogen fertilisers. By separating digestate into tailor-made fertilising products, GZV has reduced digestate transport by 55% as compared to the old situation in which unseparated digestate was exported to Germany. GZV also invested in an technique to separate the solid fraction into a low-P organic fibres and precipitated P salts. The perspectives of using organic fibres from digestate as potting soil ingredient draw the attention of the audience.

On the second day, the group travelled to Benas in Ottersberg, Germany, where 87 kton of energy crops and poultry litter are converted into 10 million m3 biogas. The plant is equipped with a novel nitrogen stripper (FiberPlus system) ammonia stripped from the digestate, and condensed as an ammonia solution reacts with gypsum forming ammonium-sulphate and calcium carbonate. Gypsum is a cheap waste product from desulphurisation of exhaust gasses of coal-fired electricity plants and this approach avoids using sulphuric acid which is normally used in N strippers. Highlight of the trip was the extraction of organic fibres from the striped digestate. These fibres, with a low ammonium content, are further processed by a paper making machine into cardboard pots and mulch mats.

The thirty visitors came from Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Austria and Croatia and are all working in the biogas sector. They all valued having had the opportunity to share their own practical experiences on biogas production and digestate processing. Overall, this first meeting after easing of the covid-19 restrictions and sadly last meeting in the framework of the SYSTEMIC project turned out to be fruitful and inspiring.

The post Living labs meeting a Groot Zevert demo plant appeared first on Systemic.

]]>
Visit to SYSTEMIC demo plant Groot Zevert, the Netherlands https://systemicproject.eu/visit-to-demo-plant-groot-zevert-nl/ Tue, 21 May 2019 12:18:33 +0000 https://systemicproject.eu/?p=3302 On Thursday 16th of May, more than 25 people follow a site visit at Groot Zevert Vergisting in Beltrum (NL). The visitors where biogas plant owners, manure processors, stakeholders from the fertiliser industry and academics from Flanders (BE), The Netherlands, Germany and further.

The post Visit to SYSTEMIC demo plant Groot Zevert, the Netherlands appeared first on Systemic.

]]>

Over 25 people joined a site visit to Groot Zevert Vergisting in Beltrum, the Netherlands on 16 May 2019. The visitors included biogas plant owners, manure processors, stakeholders from the fertiliser industry and academics from Flanders, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany and further.

The site visit was organised in the framework of two projects:  by VCM and Wageningen University & Research, partners in the Horizon 2020 project SYSTEMIC, together with Biogas-E, partner in the IWT/VIS project ‘Transbio’.

The guided tour and information were provided by responsibles from Groot Zevert Vergisting, Wageningen University & Research and Nijhuis Industries.

If you were not able to attend, you can watch the videos below (left: in English, right: in Dutch).

Production of (bio)gas and electricity


Groot Zevert started operating in the 1960s as a transport company, but in the past decennia has grown into to a complete service provider, now also processing manure and producing biogas.

The biogas installation started in 2004 and was modernised in 2016. By 2018, it had processed 135.000 tons of manure (75% of the input) and bio-waste (25% of the input) and thereby produced 10 million m³ biogas, from which 80% is transported to the factory of Friesland Campina by means of a direct, five-kilometre pipeline.

The rest of the biogas is converted into green electricity on site by means of a CHP.

The first Green Mineral Centre


In time, Groot Zevert Vergisting wishes to be the first Green Mineral Centre in the Netherlands by advanced recovery of nutrients, organic matter and water from digestate and the production of tailor-made manure-derived fertiliser products for farmers.

This would also offer a sustainable solution for the manure surplus in the area.

The digestate is first separated by means of a decanter centrifuge in a solid fraction and a liquid fraction. The solid fraction is first sanitised with heat from infrared light.

Nutrient recovery from solid and liquid fractions is achieved through two separate process cascades: the GENIUS system (developed by Nijhuis Industries) and the Re-P-eat system (developed by Wageningen University & Research).


GENIUS: NK concentrates and dischargeable water


Suspended solids are further removed from the the liquid fraction through a Dissolved Air Flotation unit, by adding flocculants and fine air bubbles, catching the solids, grease and oil in a flotating layer of sludge.

In the following steps, the liquid fraction is treated with micro-filtration, a reverse osmosis and ion exchanger.

This renders two end products:

(1) water that complies with strict discharge limits and can therefore be released in the creek nearby;

(2) an NK concentrate.

The GENIUS process has been operational at Groot Zevert since March 2019.


In the framework of the pilot project ‘an Achterhoek without artificial fertiliser’ together with ForFarmers, this mineral concentrate is mixed with ammonium sulphate and/or ammonia water, to better comply with the crops’ nutrient demands. In 2018, field trials were done on grass and in 2019, on corn.

Within the 6th Dutch action plan, the pilot project  ‘an Achterhoek without artificial fertiliser’ is allowed to use the NK concentrates (“Green Meddows Fertiliser”) on the fields of a limited amount of farmers for two years as ‘mineral fertiliser’, i.e. application of more than 170 kg N/ha.year through precicion injection.

The application and results of the field trials are carefully monitored by Wageningen University & Research. The results of agronomical efficacy, N efficiency and environmental leaching will be very valuable for the SAFEMANURE study. This is a project conducted by the Joint Research Centre, commissioned by the European Commission and will study the criteria required for the safe use of recovered fertilisers from manure.


Re-P-eat: Separation of P and organic matter

For the solid fraction, the idea is to process it to a low P solid fraction and a phosphateconcentrate (struvite).

Currently, a pilot installation of this process is operational at Groot Zevert. Nijhuis Industries will start construction of the full-scale installation shortly, based on the concept of Wageningen University & Research (WUR).

WUR developed the Re-P-eat technology, in which different steps of acidifiction of the the solid fraction lead to a solution that is rich in phosphorus.

Subsequent separation with a screw press and adding lime (magnesiumhydroxide) to the liquid fraction renders struvite crystals. These precipitate and are simply recoverd from the liquid fraction. This could be used for the production of mineral or organic fertilisers.

The solid fraction, poor in P because 90% of the inital P is removed, is very well-perceived in the Netherlands, which has strict phosphorus application limits.

The post Visit to SYSTEMIC demo plant Groot Zevert, the Netherlands appeared first on Systemic.

]]>
The SYSTEMIC Living Lab approach for Anaerobic Digester plants https://systemicproject.eu/the-systemic-living-lab-approach-for-anaerobic-digester-plants/ Mon, 25 Mar 2019 09:58:15 +0000 https://systemicproject.eu/?p=2985 What is the Living Lab approach? The SYSTEMIC project’s vision for Anaerobic Digester (AD) plants is for them to become catalysts for the valorisation of biowaste, in a context of multiple technologies recovering nutrients, organic matter and water from digestate being implemented. The five SYSTEMIC demonstration plants have already proven that this is possible. The […]

The post The SYSTEMIC Living Lab approach for Anaerobic Digester plants appeared first on Systemic.

]]>
What is the Living Lab approach?

The SYSTEMIC project’s vision for Anaerobic Digester (AD) plants is for them to become catalysts for the valorisation of biowaste, in a context of multiple technologies recovering nutrients, organic matter and water from digestate being implemented. The five SYSTEMIC demonstration plants have already proven that this is possible.

The project aims to facilitate regional collaborations and partnerships, as well as an efficient knowledge and experience exchange among demo plants, local farmers and industries, technology developers, practitioners and scientists.

This concept can only contribute to an environmentally, economically and socially sustainable circular economy as long as it is transferred to other AD plants across Europe.

It is this transfer of a circular business case of Nutrient Recovery and Re-use (NRR) from one biogas plant to another that constitutes the SYSTEMIC Living Lab approach.

Figure 1: Scheme of the concept for nutrient recovery and re-use from digestate

How does it work?

Setting up Living Labs has required the involvement of the five SYSTEMIC demonstration plants and the selection of ten additional European, large-sized AD plants as outreach locations. All of these have a strong interest in the opportunities created by NRR and are keen on exploring how they could turn into a sustainable and profitable way of preparing their businesses for the future.

All outreach locations offer excellent opportunities for the implementation of NRR technologies, enhancement of existing NRR technologies and/or optimisation of their business case.

The ten outreach plants cover: all relevant feedstocks; manure, mostly combined with digestion of various other agro-industrial and municipal organic waste streams; sewage sludge; and slaughterhouse waste. The outreach plant Atria (Finland), part of the project consortium, is a forerunner among the outreach locations.

The ten outreach locations were selected from a larger group of interested AD plants, the remainder of which were offered the possibility to remain connected to SYSTEMIC as associated plants. These plants can attend workshops and meetings organised with the outreach locations and will be asked to bring in their experiences of nutrient recovery of biomass streams.
Interested European biogas plants can still join the project as associated plants.

Setting up a Living Lab

This process is an intensive learning experience which requires adaptation of the concept to take account of variables such as social environment, economic feasibility, regional legislation, choice of technologies, and market characterisation to fit the case of the outreach location.

As a first step SYSTEMIC, will develop a business case with nutrient recovery from digestate for each outreach location and disseminate the developments, learning process and final results.

The business cases will be based on scientific knowledge, information and experiences from the demo plants, associated plants and industrial partners, as well as the end users of the recovered products.

This will result in three Living Lab meetings throughout the duration of the project, bringing together demo plants, outreach locations, associated plants, project and industrial partners.

Each meeting will provide a networking opportunity and include updates on the project’s development and intermediate results, presentations of plant owners and extensive discussion sessions.

The first Living Lab meeting took place on 22-23 February 2018 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and brought together five demo plants, nine outreach locations and two associated plants.

The meeting included visits to the waste-water treatment plant Waternet (outreach location) and the factory of ICL fertilizers Europe (partner in SYSTEMIC). Waternet already produces struvite from digestate and has the ambition to increase the amount of recovered phosphorus substantially. ICL fertilizers is a frontrunner in using recovered mineral nutrients as feedstock for high-grade granulated fertilisers.

The second Living Lab meeting is foreseen for the first quarter of 2020 and the final one for April 2021.

In between the Living Lab meetings, SYSTEMIC partners will stay in close contact with the outreach locations to continue developing their new business cases with NRR.

SYSTEMIC plants and consortium members attending the first Living Lab meeting

Living Lab visits

All SYSTEMIC plants are encouraged to visit each other in order to gain deeper knowledge of existing technologies (see an overview of the technologies available at the SYSTEMIC plants) and business cases, as well as to exchange experiences. Such Living Lab visits are initiated by either the plant owners or the SYSTEMIC consortium and seven have already taken place since the first Living Lab meeting in February 2018.

Living Lab visits to be organised by the SYSTEMIC consortium in the future include: the demo plants AM-Power (Belgium), Groot Zevert (the Netherlands), Benas (Germany); the outreach plants SCRL Kessler (Belgium) and Biogas Bree (Belgium); and the associated plant Arbio (Belgium).

All SYSTEMIC plants are kept up-to-date about intermediate project results, development of the business cases with NRR for the outreach locations, news from the sector, learning experiences gained from the Living Labs via an exclusive newsletter for outreach locations and associated plants.

Any European biogas plant interested in receiving this newsletter and attending site visits can get involved as an associated plant.

The post The SYSTEMIC Living Lab approach for Anaerobic Digester plants appeared first on Systemic.

]]>
SYSTEMIC Associated Plant Arbio BVBA wins ‘Ivan Tolpe award 2019’ with innovative water and nutrient recovery cascade https://systemicproject.eu/systemic-associated-plant-arbio-bvba-wins-ivan-tolpe-award-2019-with-innovative-water-and-nutrient-recovery-cascade/ Fri, 08 Feb 2019 14:44:22 +0000 https://systemicproject.eu/?p=2793 The post SYSTEMIC Associated Plant Arbio BVBA wins ‘Ivan Tolpe award 2019’ with innovative water and nutrient recovery cascade appeared first on Systemic.

]]>

SYSTEMIC Associated Plant Arbio BVBA wins ‘Ivan Tolpe award 2019’ with innovative water- and nutrient recovery cascade

Tim Keysers, owner of the biogas plant Arbio BVBA in Antwerp (Belgium), has won the Ivan Tolpe Award 2019 with this project ‘NPirriK’.


The Ivan Tolpe Award


The Flemish Coordination Centre for Manure Processing (VCM), partner of the SYSTEMIC project, organizes every two years a contest, looking for innovative technologies in manure processing.

With the Ivan Tolpe Award, VCM)wants to pay homage to the late Ivan Tolpe, pioneer in manure processing from West-Flanders (Belgium).

In this third edition VCM looked again for innovative ideas dealing with a demand-driven problem from the sector. Just like in the previous editions, also proposals from outside Flanders were welcome, if the concept was applicable in the Flemish context.

The goal of Ivan Tolpe Award is to develop and support innovative, promising techniques and this way guarantee the leading role of manure processing in Flanders in European context.

5 project proposals were received from Flanders, The Netherlands, Israel, Italy and Denmark. The jury of experts chose from these contestants 3 nominees: NPirriK (Flanders, Belgium), From manure to animal feed – Elsinga Beleidsplanning & Innovatie (The Netherlands) and TAYA-AV- Triple-T (Israel). Het members of VCM have voted NPirriK as the winner.

NPirriK

Arbio BVBA co-digests yearly 90.000 ton manure (60%) with organic biological waste (40%), resulting in biogas and digestate. The digestate is treated in a biological nitrification-denitrification installation, producing environmentally save nitrogen gas (N2) and a salty liquid called “effluent” with low nitrogen levels.

With the NPirriK concept, Arbio introduces a new cascade of treatment steps on the digestate, extracting water from the digestate with minimal losses of nitrogen.

By means of a belt press with bio-degradable flocculants, a liquid fraction (80%) and a solid fraction  (20%) is obtained. This solid fraction contains the largest amount of organic matter and phosphorus. It is dried and pressed into fertiliser pellets.

The liquid fraction of the digestate contains the largest share of the nitrogen and salts (mainly potassium) and has a low organic matter content. The liquid fraction is treated in subsequently a decantation tank and self-cleaning filters, before it is sent to a reverse osmosis unit, which consumes three times less energy than the biological nitrogen removal.

The reverse osmosis produces a nitrogen-rich and salty concentrate and a permeate which is poor in salts and organic matter.

The concentrate would, because of strict nutrient application limits for N and P be difficult to apply on land. But it is now mixed with the phosphorus rich solid fraction before drying, resulting in fertiliser pellets with a significantly higher N/P ratio (2 to 3 times higher than if it would not be mixed). This way the fertiliser pellets comply better with the application limits in Flanders and the demand of farmers.

Because the permeate has low salt levels, it can be used as irrigation water for the surrounding arable land.

Npirrik applied in 2017 with success for the Flemish call for subsidies for circular economy projects “Vlaanderen Circulair”. This call aimed for demonstration and dissemination projects and it granted NPirriK with 100.000 € to realize the project. The technologies (belt press, reversed osmosis) were bought and installed at Arbio and are currently starting up. They are expected to be fully operational by the end of 2019.

The post SYSTEMIC Associated Plant Arbio BVBA wins ‘Ivan Tolpe award 2019’ with innovative water and nutrient recovery cascade appeared first on Systemic.

]]>
SYSTEMIC attends Colloquium of the Interregg project Perséphone https://systemicproject.eu/systemic-attends-colloquium-of-the-interregg-project-persepohone/ Mon, 03 Dec 2018 15:47:25 +0000 https://systemicproject.eu/?p=2636 The post SYSTEMIC attends Colloquium of the Interregg project Perséphone appeared first on Systemic.

]]>

On 29th of November 2018, SYSTEMIC attended the colloquium of Interregg project: Perséphone. The project started in 2017 and will run until 2020.

SYSTEMIC Outreach Location SCRL Kessler is also involved in this project as one of the participating biogas plants.
Presentations of the colloquium, can be downloaded here.
Mind that most of them are in French.

Hydrogen gas (H2) injection for extra methane production via “bio-methanation

Download the corresponding presentation(in French) here.
The storage of renewable energy is a problem. Bio-waste and biogas both need to be stored before they can efficiently be used.
The production of renewable energy from wind or sun to electricity has the downside that the electricity is produced intermittently (e.g. No production during the night or windless days). Peaks in electricity are also not good for the electricity grid because they can cause problems for the system like heating of the cables etc.
The production of renewable energy needs to be synchronized with the need. In other words, all renewable energy (also the peaks) needs to be valorized, i.e. used or stored.

There are different ways to do this:
Batteries are already present at a large scale in our society, but the problem here is the recycling of the lithium. The lifetime of a battery nowadays, still makes it not the most sustainable way to store energy.
Another way to store renewable energy before it is used, is hydraulic power. In countries with high reliefs, the energy can be used to pump water up to a water power plant (hydraulic dam) and the energy is stored in the form of the gravity working on the water. Downside is that not each country has the geographical specifications needed for hydraulic power plants.
A third option is the production of hydrogen gas from renewable energy. Systems that transform energy to hydrogen gas by means of hydrolysis are already available, mostly with a conversion efficiency of 60%. Nonetheless, hydrogen gas is difficult to store and this requires safety precautions.

The LIST and Université de Luxembourg as partner in the Perséphone project have been focusing on bio-methanation: in this process, H2 (from renewable energy:sun and wind) and CO2 are transformed into methane (CH4). One of the ways to perform this process is catalytic conversion at high temperatures. Yet, the project focusses on another way to perform this bio-methanation: by means of micro-organisms, which are less energy consuming.
The produced methane, is much easier and safer to store than H2: i.e. it can be injected in the natural gas grid, which is already present and it is calculated that the gas grid in Belgium has a storage capacity of 3-4 months. The only thing still needed are injection points for bio-methane.

There are already different concepts developed to perform this bio-methanation with micro-organisms. For example by creating modules that carry a layer of micro-organisms that are brought in contact with an H2 and CO2 flow.
The downside of this concept is that the produced biomethane, still contains trances of H2 and CO2. The natural gas grid in Belgium puts is limit of H2 on maximum 2%, so further upgrading of the gas would still be needed.

The Perséphone project (LIST), has developed their own concept of using membranes to create a more pure bio-methane with bio-methanation.
Only the injected H2 passes the membrane and goes to the compartment where the micro-organisms are present (anaerobic hydrogenotrophic Archaea) that directly consume it and produce methane.
These Archaea, are the same group of anaerobic micro-organisms that play an important role in the normal bio-methanisation process , only here their specific ability to produce methane from H2 and CO2 is used in a separate reactor.
So eventually there are 2 reactors: one normal digester doing anaerobic digestion (“bio-methanisation”) and producing CH4 and CO2, and one Hydrogen digester, consuming H2 and CO2, producing methane (“bio-methanation”).
Between the reactors, digestate is circulated, because it contains the micro-organisms and nutrients. In the hydrogen reactor, the conditions are favored in the advantage of the hydrogenotrophic anaerobic bacteria, so they would start the bio-methanation in this reactor.
For the project, a mobile installation is developed, including the 2 reactors. CH4 and CO2 and digestate is produced in the digester reactor and CO2 and digestate are transferred to the Hydrogen digester. In the Hydrogen digester also H2 (from renewable energy sources) is injected, and the methane is produced. This bio-methanation occurs at 37°C and the micro-organisms in the digestate need a week or 2 to favor the hydrogenotrophic anaerobic bacteria.
In the project, the mobile installation is tested and will be further upscaled. Different designs for the H2 injection will be tested and different parameters (like flow of the digestate, flow of the CO2 and H2) to get an optimal methane production in the hydrogen digester. All safety aspects have been taken into account.

The ultimate goal is to replace the normal anaerobic digester reactor, by a real full scale anaerobic digestion installation and create a hydrogen digester that is mobile and flexible that can be connected to any AD plant. The hydrogen digester will then be able to produce extra CH4 from H2 (i.e. converted renewable energy from wind or solar energy also available on the plant).
For the testing done in the project, H2 gas is supplied in gas containers and is not coming from renewable energy (solar power or wind power) that is transformed into H2 by a hydrolyse unit. The aspect of the supply of H2 gas, has not been included in this project, but as mentioned before, hydrolyse units are already available with conversion efficiencies of 60%.
This is still more than the energy that would be lost during the unused or unstored “peaks” in the renewable energy production.
The concept of bio-methanasation is not possible in 1 digester because it requires a group of bacteria being favored, which are also present in the cascade of steps of the bio-methanisation process. Because of this, in an anaerobic digester (bio-methanisation), too much H2 will inhibit the later reactions in the methane production.
By duplicating the bio-methanation process in a separate Hydrogen reactor and enhancing it, both 2 processes – bio-methanisation and bio-methanation- are used to the best extent.
Also, the injection of H2 in a normal digester would be too difficult to control and therefore it would also be too dangerous.

Refinery of digestate

Download the corresponding presentation(in French) here.

Amu Mundo explains that in the Perséphone project, they are working on separation of the digestate and hereby removing the water and lowering the transport and spreading costs.
Their system is a cascade of a screw press, which removes 5-20% of the volume as solid matter. The second step is a nanofiltration, where they work with ceramic disks. These allow the digestate to be separated in a filtrate and a NPK-concentrate (5-25% of the volume). The filtrate is further separated by a RO into water (50-80% of the volume) and an NK concentrate (5-15% of the volume).
The ceramic membranes appear to have less trouble with fouling because the rotation makes them self-cleaning. Nonetheless, a regular CIP is still needed.
This system is also been made mobile (in a container on a truck) to test in the framework of the project.
The ultimate goal is to make the system at full scale for an AD plant.
The dimensioning of the membrane filtration unit at full scale will be done after thorough analyses on the digestate to be treated.
The unit uses 10kW/ton digestate treated (on average), but this also depends on the type of digestate.
They claim, this can be the solution for the problem of costly storage of digestate, because water is removed. The system would cost 5-10EUR per ton digestate treated.

Field trials

Download the corresponding presentation(in French) here.

In this part of the project, the agronomic windows will be determined in each side of the Grande Region , comparing different fertilizers with mineral fertilizers.
There are different test sites that will provide different local climates and soil types.
The field trials are done on grass land and the majority of the field trials started at the end of the winter in 2017.
The site of La Bouzule, has 2 test fields:
One with permanent grassland and one with temporary grass land, which has been cultivated with corn the previous year.
The site of Grendel-Faascht, Emmels and Erpeldange are permanent grasslands and Steinborn is a temporary grass land.

The soils in the sites of La Bouzule are predominantly clay. This is also the case for Grendel-Faascht although a heterogeneity has been seen with sand-layers.
In Erpeldange, the soil profile varied, the top was loam clay-sand, the bottom was more clay, and local it had some gravel beds.
Steinborn had a lower layer of sandstone and was in general sandy.
The soils of Emmels had a lower layer of shale and sandstone, has loam on the surface and more clay in the depth.

In total 19 variants of fertilizers were tested (different sites and different fertilizers) at a dose of 230 kg N/ha:
– No fertilisation ( Blank)
– Raw digestate (reference)
– Local digestate
– Raw manure
– Ammonium nitrate

The results of the first year (2017) show differences in the N quantity present in the harvested grass.
The N amount in the grass fertilized with digestate is a bit better that this of manure (on average 15% and manure was 11%). Nonetheless, this is still twice as less efficient as ammonia nitrate (31%).

The potentially leachable nitrogen was also measured. This is the nitrogen present in the soil as NO3. For digestate this potential is estimated on 40kg of N-NO3 in comparison to 36 kg for the blank.
When mineral fertilier is used, the leaching potential goes up to 66kg, manure is in between: at 51 kg of N-NO3.

Odour emissions: different factors can contribute the perception of smell: like weather conditions, storage and spreading techniques.
The study in the Ecobiogaz project shows that odour emissions contributed by spreading are lower with digestate than with manure.

Ammonia emissions are more pronounced with digestate than with manure.
Part of the ammonia can be lost during spreading of organic fertilisers and can reduce the fertilisation to the grass. This risk is more pronounced with liquid fraction of digestate.

Conclusions

Digestate contributes to a basic fertilisation with other nutrients that mineral fertiliser does not supply. It also helps to maintain the pH and brings organic matter to the soil.
If applied with good practices, the leaching is non existing because N is principally present as ammonium and held by the soil matrix and can be absorbed by the plants. Nitrification from 6°C on makes that the plants can absorb it in growth stage

On the other side, there is a need to spread digestate only on cloudy weather, preferably followed by rainfall. The best results were obtained by means of injection. Otherwise, volatilisation can be significant.

The dry summer of 2017 gave some results that were not expected, f.e. nitrogen supply to the grass on the Blank fields, probably by means of nitrogen mineralisation or nitrogen deposits from the air. Therefore these conclusions are preliminary and should be looked at after more field trials are done (in the coming years).

The post SYSTEMIC attends Colloquium of the Interregg project Perséphone appeared first on Systemic.

]]>
SYSTEMIC attends IBBK manure and digestate conference 2018: visit to Agro Energy Hohenlohe Gmbh https://systemicproject.eu/vcm-attends-ibbk-manure-and-digestate-conference-2018-visit-to-agro-energy-hohenlohe-gmbh/ Tue, 23 Oct 2018 14:59:34 +0000 https://systemicproject.eu/?p=2448 The post SYSTEMIC attends IBBK manure and digestate conference 2018: visit to Agro Energy Hohenlohe Gmbh appeared first on Systemic.

]]>

SYSTEMIC visits Agro Energy Hohenlohe GmbH

Agro Energy Hohenlohe in Kupferzell, Germany is a biogas plant owned by Thomas Karle.
In 2001 Thomas Karle started operating his first biogas plant. The biogas plant was constructed with quite simple technology and had a digester volume of 600m³ and a co-generation unit of 55 kWel. Which was below average at the time (190 kWel).

Mr Karle’s motivation to start producing biogas was to increase the value of this farm by utilizing the liquid manure from his fattening pigs, leaves of sugar beets and organic residues from his farm. Since the first installation, the biogas plant has been modified and optimized continuously. Mr Karle took the first step in 2003 when he increased the size of this biogas plant and installed a bigger CHP unit with approx. 300kW el.
Operation of the new plant started in 2004. To produce the necessary amount of gas Mr Karle increased the amount of digested energy crops and also added left over from fruit and vegetable processing.

Since then the plant digests rye total grain silage, corn silage, fattening pig manure and cattle manure (7%), mash, leftover from fruit and vegetable processing (DM 15-20%) and must from wine making.

The input consists out of 1/3 energy crops, 1/3 vegetable residues and 1/3 animal slurry and manure, but the proportions vary depending on the season.

A seasonal feedstock are sweet corn residues (70% leaves and 30% cob) that are fed into the digester from August till October.

Feedstock for the digesters

The plant has a reception and mixing pit for slurry (100 m³) and a new feeding system to mix the solids with the liquids. This uses 120kWel and runs half an hour every 2 hours. A grinder grinds the solid feedstocks (90kW).

Each 2 hours 4 tons of solid material is mixed with 3,5ton of liquids and fed to the thermophilic digesters. The hydraulic retention time is 21 days.

The digestate is separated by means of a screw press without polymers, in a container. The air from the container is not washed but a ventilator drives it outside the container. The solid fraction from the screw press has a dry matter content of 70%.

Screw press inside container.

Screw press inside container.

In 2007, the biogas plant was upgraded by installing a micro gas turbine in cooperation with Greenvironment gmbh.

The rest of the heat is used to heat up the digesters and drying grain. In addition to this, a greenhouse type system was constructed for drying the solid fraction of the digestate.

Greenhouse and micro-gas turbine had the synergy effect that exhaust gas from the gas turbine served as hot air for drying.
The thermos solar system resembles a green house, which uses the exhaust gas of the gas turbine and warmth of the sun to dry the solid fraction which is spread to dry in 6 weeks.

The exhaust air from the green house is not scrubbed because emission measurements showed it to have a low ammonia levels due to the nitrogen being bound organically to the solid matter.

A part of the liquid fraction of the digestate is sprayed on top of the drying solid fraction to obtain the perfect consistency for pelletizing. While the solid fraction dries, a machine, called the electrical pig ® moves over the solid fraction to mix it and turn it until it has reached a dry matter content of 80-90%.

Solar drying and electric pig®

This is fed to a pelletizing machine and yearly 100-120 tons of pellets are produced per year and sold to garden centers and in bulk as a fertilizer for viticulture.
The pellets as such are not the best product to market and Agro Energy Hohenlohe sees potential in creating specialized fertilizer pellets, by adding recovered N and P (see later) in the ratio’s demanded by the costumers.

“Naturdünger” pellets.

To maximize the heat from the CHP Mr Karle has built a district heating grid in 2009 to supply the village of Füssbach with renewable heat.

When the district heating started operation in winter 2009-2010, Füssbach was awarded to be the first “bioenergy village” in the district.

In 2012 the micro gas turbines were taken out of operation because of technical issues with the gas cleaning. Instead a second CHP unit was installed.

Since 2013 the CHPs are operated flexibly, which means that they produce electricity during when electricity is expensive and don’t run during the night, if the prices are low. Yet, the biogas plant has not reached its final configuration.

Mr Karle often cooperates with universities and research organizations. He collaborated with the Fraunhofer IGB institute in a project (BioEco SIM) that aimed to find new and feasible ways for farms to produce a diverse range of fertilizers from digestate.

Today a demonstration unit of the concept is still present on site, and it is designed and further developed by Geltz.
The concept of nutrient recovery from digestate and manure by Geltz and Frauenhofer IGB is the following:

  •  -Acidification to transfer organically bound phosphorus to the liquid phase
  • -Separation of solid and liquid fraction
  • -Precipitation of phosphorus Salts
  • -N-stripping scrubbing of the P-pour liquid

Demo installation in container (separation modules).

The demo unit fits in 1 container and can treat 1 m³ of liquid fraction of digestate per hour.
The scale of this demo is too low to be profitable (>30€ treatment cost/m³) and therefore Geltz will start building a bigger pilot installation on site that would be able to treat 10m³ of raw digestate/hour at a cost of 12-13EUR/m³ (investment depreciation 5 years + operational cost).

The pilot installation should be finished in February 2019. After that a period of further testing a finetuning will be needed before this farm-scale installation will be available on the market.

The manure or digestate is acidified to a pH of 5-5,6 which will cause the organically bound phosphorus to transfer to the liquid phase. The low pH will also limit the ammonia emission.
The acidified digestate or manure is then separated in different steps:

  1. 1. by means of a screw press
  2. 2. coarse separation by means of a vacuum separator. This looks like a screw that evacuates the liquid fraction. The solid fraction has a dry matter content of 15-20% and can be used as a soil conditioner since it contains almost no P or N.
  3. 3. the liquid fraction undergoes a microfiltration (mesh of 2µm). This restrains the bacteria and fine organic particles, and the concentrate is recycled back to the first step. Sulphates, ammonium and dissolved phosphorus and other salts go through the filter to the permeate.

A pressure of 3 bar is used on the microfiltration membranes and the filters need to be cooled for optimal treatment. The membranes are cleaned with air each 5 hours and twice a week with water.

In the next step, alkali is added to the permeate to raise the pH. Different kinds of alkali can be used for this f.e. Ca(OH)2 or NaOH. The amount that needs to be added depends on the buffer capacity of the permeate.

The elevated pH will stimulate the precipitation of phosphorus salts like NH4MgPO4·6H2O, KMgPO4·6H2O and Ca(H2PO4)2.
When the farm scale pilot is built, a chamber filter press will separate the liquid from the phosphorus salts, which have a dry matter content of 50% and a P2O5 concentration of 10%.

Demo installation in container (precipitation modules).

The farm scale pilot installation is estimated to be able to produce 30 kg of phosphorus salts per m³ of raw digestate, when treating 80 m³ of digestate per day (in 8 hours).
The amount of organic (P-free solid) fraction coming from is estimated to be around 200 kg/tonne digestate.

Florian Geltz with P-poor liquid.

Ammonia stripping scrubbing installation.

The P-free liquid still contains ammonium and this is converted into ammonia by elevating the temperature to 60°C by using recovered heat from the CHP. To make sure that all ammonium is present under the form of ammonia, extra alkali can be added too.

The solution is trickled through a carrier material from the top down of a stripping column.

A counterflow of air captures the ammonia in the gas phase.

In the next step, the ammonia is scrubbed from the ammonia-rich air by means of an acid solution (40% H2SO4, 20kg/m³). Because after a first scrubbing step, the pH is reduced to 7, a second scrubber is needed to scrub the remaining ammonia from the air.

An ammonium sulphate solution (12% N) is recovered. In Germany, this product has the status of mineral fertilizer and it can be used above 170 kg N/ha.year.

The post SYSTEMIC attends IBBK manure and digestate conference 2018: visit to Agro Energy Hohenlohe Gmbh appeared first on Systemic.

]]>
SYSTEMIC attends IBBK digestate and manure conference 2018: visit to Biogas Rück GmbH https://systemicproject.eu/vcm-attends-ibbk-digestate-and-manure-conference-2018-visit-to-biogas-ruck-gmbh/ https://systemicproject.eu/vcm-attends-ibbk-digestate-and-manure-conference-2018-visit-to-biogas-ruck-gmbh/#respond Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:48:21 +0000 https://systemicproject.eu/?p=2394 The post SYSTEMIC attends IBBK digestate and manure conference 2018: visit to Biogas Rück GmbH appeared first on Systemic.

]]>

SYSTEMIC visits Biogas Rück

The biogas plant in Merkendorf-Gerbersdorf in Germany has 4 digesters and a post digester.
They treat in separate lines organic waste and energy crops.
The energy crop-line feeds to 2 thermophilic digesters (each 1200 m³):

  • -maize silage (150 ha/year)
  • -green waste(20 ha/year)
  • -corn-shred (350 ton/year)
  • -pig slurry (1800 m³ /year)

Left- covern maize silage
Riggh 2 thermophilic digesters and hall for adding maize silage to the digesters

Maize silage in walled storage that can be closed off completely.

The maize silage is stored outside covered by a foil in a walled area. Here maize silage is load up a small truck, to prevent spilling and driven to a machine that transports the silage with a conveyor belt to the digesters.
When in winter, the maize silage is all gone, the walls of the storage can be closed off and this is used as an open digestate storage lagoon. According to the owner there appear to be no real emissions, since sometimes even wild ducks are seen swimming on the digestate lagoon.

The organic waste line was built in 1995 and treats to the other 2 thermophilic digesters (also each 1200m³):
Leftover food, bio-waste, flotate and grease, blood and dairy waste.

All liquid wastes and slurries are unloaded in a drive-in building which can be closed off for emissions. There the liquids are pumped directly from the truck into a storage.
From this storage the feedstocks go to a heat exchanger which uses CHP heat to heat up oil and this heats up the liquid feedstocks up to 130°C and is hereby hygenized. After that, they are fed into the digesters.
Biogas from the energy crop line is burned in a CHP (Deutz) to 500kWel and the heat is recovered by a heat pipeline to the village of Gebersdorf to provide heat for households and 1 small industrial site.

The biogas from the organic waste line produces 430 kWel and is used on site to heat up the digesters and evaporators (see later).
The digestate from the energy crop line is used as a fertilizer for crops.

The digestate from the organic waste line is separated in a modificated vibrating sieve separator, which used to have an application in the industry where it separated oil and water.

The solid fraction store in a half open hangar and used as a fertilizer of Mr Rück’s own 90 ha of land.

Modified sieve separator, separating digestate.

The liquid fraction of the digestate goes to a vacuum evaporation system of MKR Metzger.

The evaporator (multiphase) has a pressure of -180mbar and operates at 60°C. The water evaporates together with the ammonia.

In a second step the ammonia vapor is scrubbed with sulphuric acid and an ammonia sulphate solution and clean condensate is obtained.

Each year 10.000 m³ of water is evaporated and condensed. The owner said that it was to only way to reduces costs of digestate disposal and prevent the biogas plant from downsizing.

Multiphase evaporator for digestate and vapour scrubber (MKR Metzger).

The total cost of the plant was 900.000EUR for the energy crop line and 800.000EUR for the organic waste line. The plant can afford this, mainly because of the heat bonus and the reduces disposal costs for digestate.

Trials done with the ammonia sulphate showed that AS was more available for the  crops than pig slurry and proved that there was less nitrate leaching.

The air from the truck delivery zone, separation zone was transferred to the engines and burned. Other than that, there was no air treatment.

Multiphase evaporator for digestate (left and right) and vapour scrubber (middle) by MKR Metzger.

Storage tank for ammonium sulphate solution.

The post SYSTEMIC attends IBBK digestate and manure conference 2018: visit to Biogas Rück GmbH appeared first on Systemic.

]]>
https://systemicproject.eu/vcm-attends-ibbk-digestate-and-manure-conference-2018-visit-to-biogas-ruck-gmbh/feed/ 0
Outreach Location Biogastur https://systemicproject.eu/outreach-location-biogastur/ https://systemicproject.eu/outreach-location-biogastur/#respond Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:44:42 +0000 https://systemicproject.eu/?p=2157 The post Outreach Location Biogastur appeared first on Systemic.

]]>

Outreach Location Biogastur – 2018

26st and 27nd of September, a meeting was organized in the framework of the H2020 project SYSTEMIC, which aims to stimulate the implementation of sustainable and economically viable business cases for bio-waste, manure, sewage sludge treatment in Europe.

The meeting brought together representatives of 4 anaerobic digestion plants from different regions in Europe and the SYSTEMIC consortium.

The meeting took place in the meeting room “El Liceo” in Navia, Asturias, in the north of Spain, close to Biogastur, one of SYSTEMIC’s outreach locations.

To update the participating outreach locations on project results

  • -To demonstrate the business development tool and start testing with it
  • -Get their feedback on the tool
  • -Visit the biogas plant of Biogastur

Participant Organisation/Company Country Function in SYSTEMIC
Andre Schelfhout

Patrick Schelfhout

Biogas Bree Belgium Outreach Location
Michel Peter SCRL Kessler Belgium
Tomislav Kitonic

Ante Topalovic

Bojana Croatia
Rubén Wensell Biogastur Spain
Oscar Schoumans Wageningen University & Research The Netherlands Project Coordinator and WP5 leader of SYSTEMIC
Claudio Brienza University of Ghent Belgium WP1 member of SYSTEMIC
Ludwig Hermann Proman Austria WP2 leader SYSTEMIC
Marieke Verbeke VCM Belgium WP3 leader SYSTEMIC
Lies Bamelis DLV (Profex-United Experts) Belgium Subcontractor WP3 SYSTEMIC

Welcome to Navia

Ignacio García Palacios, Mayor of Navia City Council (Spanish Socialist Workers Party)


Rubén Wensell, agricultural engineer and representative of Biogastur, Outreach Location

The SYSTEMIC consortium and outreach locations were warmly welcomed in the conference room of El liceo in Navia by the Mayor of Navia himself.
The mayor described the region of Navia as the region with the highest milk production in the North of Spain.

The region is also characterized by it’s agriculture, which is mainly corn, used as feed for the livestock.
In this region there are 134 dairy farms with each 200 cows, resulting in a density of 4 cows per ha and a manure surplus. Using the manure directly as fertilizer caused probles with nitrification of the groundwater. The mayor realized the importance of this issue for the region and was from the beginning very involved in the conception of the Biogastur-project.
This enormous biogas plant had the goal to treat 400.000 tonnes of cattle manure from the region with anaerobic digestion, hereby producing 30 GWel per year and the possibility to upgrade the biogas to biomethane to be used as vehicle fuel for cars and trucks. In full capacity the plants would produce 25.000 tonnes of dried solid fraction (80% DM), 350.000 tonnes of liquid fraction and 300 tonnes of struvite per year.
The mayor’s influence has undenyibly contributed to the succes of the Biogastur. The biogas plant is now running for a year, but at the moment only working on half capacity since it is still in start up phase. The mayor sees this project as 3 solutions for 1 manure problem:

  • -The production biomethane as a green fuel for trucks.
  • -The production of green electricity.
  • -The creation of an environmentally safe fertilizer (digestate) that is low in nitrogen.

According to the farmers, who have been fertilizing their corn fields with the digestate, an increase the yield with 25% yield can be visually noticed. These numbers will be confirmed when the harvest is measured.

Visit to Biogastur Biogas Plant

Business Plan

The biogas plant is located in Navia in the province of Asturias in Spain and was started up in 2017 and is now running for a year.
The design of the plant and the business plan took nine years. Eventually the plant was built with 80 million € investments from 5 private investors and the milk cooperative (25%) and completely without any form of governmental subsidy. There is also no feed-in tariff for the produced electricity and gas.
The design of the plant and the business plan took nine years. Eventually the plant was built with 80 million € investments from 5 private investors and the milk cooperative a25%)(nd completely without any form of governmental subsidy. There is also no feed in tariff for the produced electricity and gas.

  1. Intake of the manure
  2. Electricity production and marketing on the grid
  3. Marketing the end products: dried solid fraction of digestate and liquid fraction of digestate

Each income contributes to ±30% of the incomes, so each income balances the others and the plant doesn’t depend on one income route completely, which makes it more resilient for changes in the market.

The business plan of Biogastur is quite unique in Europe and therefore it will be studied in detail by the SYSTEMIC project.

Figure 1. Overview of the Biogastur plant

Feedstock

The plant has a total capacity to treat 400.000 tons per year.
350.000 tons per year consists of cattle slurry. Since the milk cooperative is one of the shareholders of the biogas plant, the manure supply is contractually established. When farmers cannot supply the amount of manure they promised, they pay a fine to make up for the income loss Biogastur suffers.

Biogastur has its own truck fleet with which they daily or weekly collect the cow manure from cattle farms in a radius of 50km. The furthest one is 70 km away, but this one is very large and only supplies once a week.
The milk cooperative (and thus the dairy farmers) are charged 2-2,5€/ton to treat their manure, including transport.
The milk cooperative also supplies 25.000 tons of dairy waste (spoiled milk, whey, etc.) per year.

Other waste streams (25.000 tons per year) that are digested are rabbit manure, rabbit slaughterhouse waste, flower, molasse and glycerin. Biogastur pays for the energy rich feedstocks, f.e. glycerin is 5 times more expensive than molasses.

(2) in Figure 1 is the area where trucks with liquids can be washed and emptied. Residual heat from the CHP is used to heat up a water boiler (Figure 3) and warm water is used to clean the trucks.

Figure 2. Biogastur trucks with liquid waste streams or cattle slurry

Figure 3. Boiler for warm water for cleaning trucks.

(1) in Figure 1 has a special reception unit for solid waste. (3) shows the mixing tank for solid waste and manure, (4) are 3 tanks of each 60m³ for liquid wastes (glycerin, molasse, whey, spoiled milk). The mixing tank is 3000m³ and has 3 days buffer capacity. It can also serve as quarantine. The mixing tank mixes the solid waste with liquids to a DM content of 8%, approximately. This mixture is pumped to the digesters.

Figure 4. Mixing/buffer tank

3 storage tanks for liquid wastes

The biogas plant has 4 thermophilic digesters of each 7000 m³ (5 in Figure 1). Each digester has 3 recirculation pipes, and one of them also is a feeding pipe. This last one feeds pre-heated feedstock at the bottom, pumping it in a circular movement around the digester. At the same time, the three pipes suck up digestate from the top in the middle of the digester and inject it again at the bottom parallel to the walls of the digester. This creates a vortex moment in the digester which mixes the digestate and feedstock and realized optimal biogas production (Figure 5). The residence time is 3 to 4 weeks.

Figure 5. Digester with recirculation pipes. Yellow lines show the vortex moment in the digester.

Sometimes flour is used as a feedstock. Instead of mixing this in the mixing tank, this is carefully injected directly in the digesters in very small volumes, to not influence the dry matter content to drastically, since the viscosity of the digestate in the digester determines how easy biogas is created and can escape the slurry.

Since it concerns thermophilic digestion, which is more sensitive than mesophilic digestion, the input loading rate is since the start-up increased very slowly to guarantee the adaptation of the bacteria from mesophilic to thermophilic. This is also the main reason the plant only runs on half capacity at the moment. All 4 digesters digesters are being used but the content is transferred from one to the other as needed in the preliminary tests and essays.

Biogas and heat

Yearly 17.000.000Nm³ of biogas is produced.
The biogas is scrubbed (6 in Figure 1) to remove the hydrogen sulfide (H2S) to <1000 mg /L, to guarantee the efficiency of the CHP engine and prevent corrosion damage to it. The removal of H2S efficiently facilitates the upgrade of biogas to natural gas quality.

Biogastur works with a patented system based on a biological desulfurization tower: the BIDOX® system (BIological Desulphurization by OXidation) (Figure 6). Biogas desulphurisation using the BIDOX is not associated with odour emission, because the system is completely closed. In addition there is no need for internal cleaning or biomass discharge or adding chemicals.

The BIDOX represents a fully automated and biological system in which biogas is treated in counter flow with washing water. During this treatment aerobic bacteria attached to the packing material inside the BIDOX convert H2S in the biogas almost entirely into sulphate.
To do this, the bacteria require oxygen. Therefore, 20% of the volume of the biogas is added in O2. The resulting methane concentration is around 64%.

The sulphate is discharged with the BIDOX effluent in the form of very diluted sulphuric acid. The sulphuric acid is discharged via the aerobic purification (MBR) installation (see later), where it is used as a nutrient and improves the buffer capacity.
The exploitation costs for the installation are low when compared to other biogas desulphurisation technologies. The power consumption of the BIDOX system is in the order of 0,21 kWh/kg H2S removed and the combined operational and maintenance costs mount up to around 0,10 -0,25 € / kg H2S removed. The majority of the maintenance costs are associated with the calibration of the measurement systems.

Process obstruction as a result of sulphur precipitation or foaming are not observed as a result of the low pH. For more information visit the Colsen website.

Figure 6. BIDOX® biological desulphurisation of the biogas

Figure 5. Digester with recirculation pipes. Yellow lines show the vortex moment in the digester.

The biogas is valorised in to 30 GWh of electrical energy per year by means of in 3 Jenbacher 420 CHP engines (7) of each 1,5MW with and electrical efficiency of 42% and a thermal efficiency of 44%.

The heat from the CHP, hot water, hot air and flu gasses are recovered as 4,692 kWth and this is used to heat up the feedstock (by means of a heat exchanger, Figure 7), the belt dryer and water in a water boiler for internal cleaning (Figure 3) and the dryer. All the heat is used for warming up the total raw materials received, as for the thermophilic process they have to increase their temperature up to 52-55ºC and also for the belt dryer.

Figure 7. Heat exchangers.

Part of the electricity is used on the site and the rest is sold to the electricity distributor at market prices (highest price in October 2018 was 75€/MW).

Biogastur is looking into upgrading the biogas to liquified biogas (LBG) to use as fuel for their truck fleet. To develop this technology, Biogastur has signed a plan with the national leader in gas distribution, ENAGAS, which will invest around 1,2 M€ in the upgrading technology and the connection to the national grid. The biomethane will be enriched from the starting point of 60-65 % up to the 95-98% of methane, required for the national grid.

Separation of the digestate

After anaerobic digestion, the digestate (350.000 tons per year) is separated by means of 2 centrifuges (Figure 8). To improve the separation efficiency several polymers are used, depending on the temperature, the pH, the solids concentration, and so on. Figure 9 shows a picture of one of the powder polymer (CV 150, CV 300) is added.

Figure 8. Centrifuges to separate the digestate.

Figure 8. Centrifuges to separate the digestate.

Figure 8. Centrifuges to separate the digestate.

Figure 8. Centrifuges to separate the digestate.


A curious fact was that there was almost no smell of ammonia in the neighborhood of the centrifuges. This suggests an air cleaning treatment step before the separation step (see further).

Drying of solid fraction

In (8) of Figure 1 the dryer is located. This is a belt dryer which dries with recovered heat of the CHP the solid fraction to 75-90% dry matter content. 10.000 tonnes of water per year is evaporated and the solid fraction is stored in a warehouse (9). Biogastur sells this to farmers as fertilizer with their own (precision) spreading equipment for a fixed price.

Now, during the start-up, the dried product is often offered for free to farmers as trial, but once the plant will be running on full scale a price will be asked for the solid fertilizer + application. The microbiological analyses on a mix of ashes with dry fraction and sawdust done have proven to contain halve the amount of E. Coli, Streptococcus, enterobacteria and other colonies ,compared to the cow bedding done with sand and calcium carbonate.

Figure 10. Belt dryer and storage of dried solid fraction.

Figure 8. Centrifuges to separate the digestate.

Air cleaning system

Again, no smell was noticeable at the dryer or the exhaust pipes, yet there was no air washing system nor biobed visible.
The air cleaning system appeared to be also patented and therefore no more details about the mechanism could be revealed. The system proved to be very effective, and the environmental permits were obtained by only limited description of the mechanism, and its efficacy substantiated with emission measurements.

This led to a lot of speculation amongst the visiting Outreach Locations and project partners.
Since there was no smell during separation, it was suggested that the air cleaning should be located somewhere in the digester or on the raw digestate.
Also no chemicals (acids) were noticed on site, which suggested that air scrubbing with acid was not done here. The fact that ammonium sulphate is subject to REACH regulation in Spain, reinforces this hypothesis.

Somehow the ammonia is removed from the digestate and most likely, the liquid ammonia solution is biologically treated in the MBR-NAS.
Nonetheless, we have no confirmation of these speculations and therefore the air cleaning mechanism and technology remains a secret.

Nitrification-denitrification of the liquid fraction

350.000 tons of liquid fraction per year is produced by the centrifuge. This goes to a NAS® (New Activated Sludge) system in 2 aeration basins (10) in which air is blown. The basins contain an activated sludge in which anammox bacteria constitute a part of the biomass (Figure 11).

Nitrification-denitrification of the liquid fraction

350.000 tons of liquid fraction per year is produced by the centrifuge. This goes to a NAS® (New Activated Sludge) system in 2 aeration basins (10) in which air is blown. The basins contain an activated sludge in which anammox bacteria constitute a part of the biomass (Figure 11).

Figure 11. Scheme of nitrification-denitrification of Annamox.

In the first aerobic tank, a part of the ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N) is mainly oxidized to nitrite and partly to nitrate. In the next anoxic compartment, the nitrite and nitrate are denitrified. At the same time they convert COD into CO2 and biomass. Part of the remaining nitrite and NH4-N is converted directly into nitrogen gas by autotrophic organisms (Annamox, red arrows in Figure 11), under exclusion of oxygen and without conversion of COD. The remaining nitrogen is oxidized to nitrate in the 2nd aerated compartment. This nitrate is further denitrified during internal circulation.

Figure 12. Membranes that separate the sludge from the effluent.

NAS-effluent before discharge.

The activated sludge, which contains the bacteria, is separated from the effluent by means of ultrafiltration membranes (MBR) (11). The effluent (13) contains 200 mg N/L and Spanish discharge limits allow this to be discharged together with the purified wastewater of the paper factory (100 x dilution) in the sea. The effluent can also be used as liquid fertilizer for corn and other local crops, including municipal parks and golf courses.

Phosphorus recovery

The plant has and ANPHOS® reactor (patented) to recover phosphorus from the NAS®effluent. During the previous treatment step, the phosphate present is largely converted into ortho-phosphate with potassium as counter-ion.

The basic principle of the ANPHOS® process is the aeration of the NAS®effluent, which induces a positive pH shift. As a result of the addition of magnesium(hydr)oxide, the ortho-phosphate reacts with ammonia and magnesium ions to form magnesium-ammonium-phosphate (MgAP) or magnesium-potassium-phosphate (MgKP) also known as ‘struvite’. After the reaction, the struvite is precipitated, dewatered and dried and can directly be applied as substitute for agricultural fertilizers.

There are some small deposits of struvite in the pipes near the centrifuges, which proves that struvite precipitation is technically possible.

Yet, because the biogas plant is currently not yet running on full capacity, there is not enough phosphorus in the effluent (average 177mg P/L) to precipitate large volumes of struvite. Which means that at the moment it is not yet profitable to recovery phosphorus from the effluent.

Figure 13. ANPHOS® reactor.

Struvite precipitate from pipes near the centrifuge.

It is estimated that the plant could produce at maximum capacity 1 tonne of struvite per day. A few years ago, about 1100 €/tonne struvite was a realistic market price. If a lower price is offered, there is still an option to blend the struvite with the solid fraction and sell it as complete P-organic matter blend.

Conclusions and feedback

As far as biogas concerns, Spain is a market that is still has to be developed, and more specifically to agro-industrial biogas. In this sector, Biogastur we will be market leaders on the level of energy production (whether as biogas or such as electricity), the technologies implemented and the level of management of waste and GHG reduction (34,000 tonnes equivalent annual CO2).

The outreach locations and consortium members were impressed by the plant and especially the business case running without subsidies.
The patented air cleaning system impressed and frustrated everyone, because the working mechanism remained secret.

Yet, some critical remarks can be made.
The composition of the effluent after NAS® (200ppm N) is extremely high in comparison to the discharge limits in other European countries (f.e. 15 ppm in Belgium for surface water).

One does need to mention that Biogastur’s effluent is discharged in the sea and not in surface water and that the effluent is first diluted (factor 100) with treated wastewater from the paper factory.

Nonetheless, in most European countries, dilution is not regarded as a waste treatment step.
Also, the plant does not recover any nutrients (yet). All nitrogen is lost as N2 and because of the REACH obligation for ammonium sulphate, N recovery by means of stripping-scrubbing is no obvious alternative. On the other hand, other markets for ammonium sulphate, -nitrate of ammonium solution could be researched (cfr. Industrie, paper factory?) to also valorize this nutrient.

Yet, Biogastur wants to wait and see how the demand evolves for liquid fraction or NAS-effluent as a fertiliser. If this is positive, they will discharge less into the sea and give or sell more to local farmers.

Also have questions or remarks on the plant of Biogastur? Let us know in the comments section below.

The post Outreach Location Biogastur appeared first on Systemic.

]]>
https://systemicproject.eu/outreach-location-biogastur/feed/ 0
Outreach Location Biogas Bree visits Waterleau New Energy and AM-Power – 2018 https://systemicproject.eu/outreach-location-biogas-bree-visits-waterleau-new-energy-and-am-power/ https://systemicproject.eu/outreach-location-biogas-bree-visits-waterleau-new-energy-and-am-power/#respond Sat, 07 Jul 2018 11:09:36 +0000 https://systemicproject.eu/?p=2083 The post Outreach Location Biogas Bree visits Waterleau New Energy and AM-Power – 2018 appeared first on Systemic.

]]>

Outreach Location Biogas Bree visits Waterleau New Energy and AM-Power

Actions Biogas Bree in SYSTEMIC

  • -Biogas Bree (BB) has contacts with a consultant/engineer with a lot of experience in optimizing heat exchange. He already made a tool to calculate how much heat is required to evaporate a certain amount of water.
  • -Feedstocks have already been documented by DLV (consultant of BB).
  • -Environmental permit submitted for 9000m³ storage and ammonia stripper-scrubber
  • -Has received representatives of the Turkish associated plant Agman on their plant.
  • -Has visited Waterleau New Energy, AMPower and Biogastur

Characterisation of problems and pressure at Biogas Bree

– BB produces a lot of OBW digestate (43.000 tonnes/year)

– Pressure on local market of OBW digestate from

Biogas plants in West-Flanders to storage (and land) in South-Limburg, Brabant

The Netherlands (near the border)

Other large biogas plants in the neighbourhood

This situation can be maintainable for a year or two but will probably also change when fertilisation limits in the Netherlands will become more strict.

– High quality products render the digestate very viscous! ~viscosity cattle manure

Makes separation suboptimal +current cost for chemicals is too high and this influences the business case

Vision of BB for creating better marketable products

Extra storage capacity (9000 m³) to bridge winter period

Get a LF of digestate with composition (3/1/4)= 180N/65P2O5/270K per ha or lower but same ratio and less volume

Scenario 1

Current ratio is more or less good so just remove the water in LF digestate to reduce the volume.

+
less storage and transport costs higher NPK content still favourable for customers even when a higher price is offered?
Use this profit to offer the contractors and arable farmers for taking the LF of the digestate. The higher prices offered, will create more potential customers. short term solution (e.g. pressure from competition and legislation will still be there or get worse)
no investments in extra technologies needed no persevering nutrient recycling and local marketing (circular economy?
because of smaller volume, the LF of digestate can be marketed further away End product of evaporator is a stream of ammonia water. This needs to be marketed.

Scenario 2

P content of LF dig should be 60% lower than current content LF dig:

P has to be removed
–>improve P separation efficiency of the centrifuge by means of the right amount and choice of chemicals and polymer
P is limiting factor for land application, so if desired ratio is (3/1/4),

the efficiency of the P-separation determines the amount of N that needs to be removed

N content of LF dig should be 50% lower, than current content LF dig:

N has to be removed
–>Ammonia stripper/scrubber

K content of LF dig is OK

Reduction of the volume and concentration of all nutrients

The volume can be reduced by own evaporator, heat is already available
or look at evaporation system?

Evaporation of the water will concentrate K but also P and N!

So P and N in LF should twice as much removed to compensate for this

Balance profit from volume reduction and K content with cost of more intensive P2O5 and N removal!

+
valuable end product with NPK 3/1/4: attractive product for arable farmers in the region: less transport costs Problem is that the digestate is very viscous and would require a lot of chemicals to have an efficient separation of the P. Find the cheapest way to do get P as low as possible
If successful: a more efficient P-separation with(out) chemical and/or polymer use solid fraction of digestate that needs to be dried/blended and marketed
Smaller volumes LF digestate can be marketed outside the region: create more marketing opportunities investment + operational costs for N stripper/scrubber
Circular and sustainable for the future (e.g. anticipating on stricter fertilizing limits) BB is no fan of an ammonia stripper with packing material because of viscosity of LF digestate. Stripper/scrubber should not have a high maintenance cost or time.
Own design with sprayers?
More independent of the competition (e.g. other biogas plants with digestate to get rid of) Ammonium nitrate or ammonium sulphate stream needs to be marketed
Possible to use parts of technology cascade on a part of the LF of the digestate to create different end products and mix them as desired (customized fertilizers) The evaporator is now used for reducing the water from the raw pig manure. Contamination issues rising when OBW LF digestate is also used in this evaporator:

Need for separate evaporators

Other scenario’s for solving this problem?

Choice of technique cascade will depend on what end products the costumers want: Ratio (3/1/4), small or large volumes, low P, organic matter, cheap prices,…?

Learnings from visits to Waterleau New Energy and AM-Power (July 2018)

Invest in an evaporator and/or and ammonia stripper/scrubber to lower the volume and N content of the liquid fraction of OBW digestate?

BB thought that a vacuum evaporator would not be a good option for them because of the high investment cost and the fact that an extra product is created (an NPK concentrate) that has to be disposed of.

The technical and financial feasibility of this idea still has to be researched very carefully.

WNE’s evaporator (atmospheric) is heated with steam. Biogas Bree sees the potential of producing steam, but then also has to consider the investment in a steam boiler (±100.000€ per motor) and this should be balanced with the profits of producing better marketable end products and transporting less water.

Find a way to improve their current separation of OBW digestate with the centrifuge at a low cost.

WNE uses additives (polymers) to improve the separation efficiency. They have good experiences with some suppliers of polymers but emphasize that they come with a high cost.

BB want to avoid using polymers, because creating a polymer solution from powder polymer demands the use of ±20% water per m3 of digestate, which creates extra volume to get rid of in the end.

 WNE has good experiences with mixing molasses (more viscous feedstock) with fibre rich feedstocks, or even manure (that maybe have lower biogas potential). They are convinced that it is very important to control the dry matter content up front. If it is higher than 10%DM it will cause difficulties in pumping. Their advice is to find ways to reduce the organic fraction, because this will determine the viscosity much more than the salt content.

Nonetheless, it is difficult to put some input streams on hold if they present themselves. For this you need enough storage capacity or very good relationships with your suppliers.

 Since their main focus is producing biogas, at first BB was not interested in using the combination of inputs as a setscrew for controlling the properties of the digestate. After hearing the experiences of AMPower and WNE, BB realized that the quality of digestate can have a huge impact the efficacy of the processing/treatment techniques and therefore cannot be underestimated.

The difficulty is to balance the feedstocks based on biogas potential, mass-and hydraulic balance (which contributes to viscosity of the digestate and the post treatment) and marketing/disposal of end products.

Improve the drying system where they now dry the animal digestate (e.g. digestate from manure).

AMPower has good experiences with their fluidized bed dryer and WNE prefers their disk-dryer.

Future plans and learnings from visits

BB found the visits very useful and has had open conversations with both AMPower and Waterleau, but came back with even more questions.

Their current business case at their location seems to be not so problematic after all and they have faith in the technologies they have implemented now.

Nonetheless, they strongly believe that working towards an end product that can be easier and cheaper disposed of, can make them better prepared for the future -e.g. stricter fertilizer limits, environmental control, financial security, etc.

The (long term) costs and benefits of implementing nutrient recovery or offering a higher price for disposal of their current product have to be carefully analysed and calculated, before considering an investment in new technologies.

  • BB will continue to learn from SYSTEMIC but will do their own research simultaneously.
  • A new employee (recently graduated engineer) will start in summer 2018 and would be doing research on all previously mentioned ideas and scenarios.
  • BB will start investigating the influence of certain feedstocks on the viscosity of their digestate. Maybe Biogas Bree’s case can be involved in the PhD of Claudio Brienza from UGent, doing his research about the relation of parametrs in the feedstocks on the separation efficiency of the digestate.

The post Outreach Location Biogas Bree visits Waterleau New Energy and AM-Power – 2018 appeared first on Systemic.

]]>
https://systemicproject.eu/outreach-location-biogas-bree-visits-waterleau-new-energy-and-am-power/feed/ 0
ENSY AB visits Outreach Location Waterleau New Energy and Demo Plant AM-Power https://systemicproject.eu/ensy-ab-visits-outreach-location-waterleau-new-energy-and-demo-plant-am-power/ https://systemicproject.eu/ensy-ab-visits-outreach-location-waterleau-new-energy-and-demo-plant-am-power/#respond Thu, 05 Jul 2018 12:30:40 +0000 https://systemicproject.eu/?p=2146 The post ENSY AB visits Outreach Location Waterleau New Energy and Demo Plant AM-Power appeared first on Systemic.

]]>

ENSY AB visits Outreach Location Waterleau New Energy and Demo Plant AM-Power – 2018

Introduction to ENSY AB, Sweden.

ENSY AB is a private technology company in Sweden, active since October 2011, developing solutions for small scale farm-based nutrient recovering systems of manure. The core in ENSYs technology is the Multibox® system, a modularized system of mechanical and chemical de-watering and nutrient recovery modules.

ENSY operates a pilot plant outside Falkenberg in the south of Sweden together with a pig farmer.  For now, they focus on plants that can handle 15-30 000 tonnes manure per year.

ENSY has also an ambition to recover nutrients from digestate from biogas production and have made pilot studies with such input streams. However, for now they focus on manure, as such input material varies less over time than that from biogas plants and therefore easier to treat.

Drivers for nutrient recovery in Sweden

  • Manure and digestate consist of 92-95% water for which spreading and storage has associated risks of losing a large proportion of the nutrients.
  • Traditional spreading of manure, using heavy tankers etc, reduces soil fertility due to soil compacting, especially in clay soils. Soil compaction leads to decreased crop yields, which estimates for a reduced profit of 0,36-3,6 € per ton manure spread.
  • Shortage of land for livestock farmers, typically hampering the transition to more effective large-scale livestock farms.
  • Investment costs of manure storage and handling systems (new manure pits with sealing systems) and costs of transport and distribution of manure (long distance)Shortage of nitrogen fertilizers for organic farmer.

This last point has an impact on the market value of recovered NPK products, because in Sweden, Bio-certified, organic farmers are not allowed to use mineral nitrogen fertilizers. Therefore, the price for certified, organic nitrogen is substantially above that of standard nitrogen products

The Multibox® technology

Manure is separated in several steps. The first dewatering step uses two different types of in-house design self-cleaning filters (patent pending), tailored for the particle size and viscosity of the input stream. The purpose is to reduce all suspended solids in the liquid fraction above a certain size, typically 100-400 micron.  In a second phase of the system, mechanical and chemical treatment steps are combined to further purify the liquid.

The solid phase is further dewatered by ENSY’s in-house squeeze press technology without the use of coagulants or polymers to a dry matter content of 30-35%, comparable to the solid fraction of a decanter centrifuge (with the use of polymers). This product can be dried and pelletized further for better storability and can be used as a soil improver. ENSY plans to add concentrated nutrients from the liquid phase and dry the product further by means of composting, to produce a nutrient rich and hygienized fertilizer product. By composting the C/N ratio is reduced, which makes the nitrogen better accessible for the plants.

The fertilizer product is planned to be packed in big bags and stored and handled as standard mineral fertilizer. The product can also be Bio-certified depending on the origin of manure or digestate.

Contact person: Ulf Orrenius    ulf@ensy.eu    +46709705533

ENSY observations from the AMPower and Waterleau New Energy visits

The situation in Flanders is quite challenging when it comes to manure handling. Due to shortage of land, stringent fertilization limitations (Flanders is a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone according to the Nitrate Directive) and phosphor saturation of land, some farmers are obliged process the manure.

Most popular manure treatment is a separation in liquid and solid phase followed by biological treatment (nitrification-denitrification to reduce the nitrogen content) of the liquid phase. A drawback is loss of nitrogen to the atmosphere which both is a waste of nutrients for the plants and a climate hazard. The solid phase (containing most of the P) is typically transported abroad, often to France, after hygienization in composting tunnels. Nutrient separation/recovery from manure and digestate is only undertaken in a few cases, by pioneers, since the recovered products are still seen as manure by Flemish legislation and therefore the same fertilizing limits apply.

The business case of the biogas plants we visited rests on that the production of electricity is supported by ca 100 € per MWh.

From both plants visited there is an interest for more efficient de-watering technology to replace centrifuge-decanter technology to :

  • reduce the amount of cat-ion polymers applied
  • to reduce the output solid matter content (at present 2-3%).

Such technology could reduce the organic load on the later treatment steps (evaporator, Reversed Osmosis) and thereby reduce the costs of energy and chemicals. The first separation step of ENSYs Multibox® system may be useful here.

The post ENSY AB visits Outreach Location Waterleau New Energy and Demo Plant AM-Power appeared first on Systemic.

]]>
https://systemicproject.eu/ensy-ab-visits-outreach-location-waterleau-new-energy-and-demo-plant-am-power/feed/ 0